TOPIC HUB / RESEARCH LIBRARY

Claude & GPT Workflows

Controlled comparisons of model workflows, prompts, context and tool use.

Research-design drafts identify proposed methods and limitations. They do not claim completed experiments.

Research blueprint

Claude Versus GPT for Ambiguous Requirements

A useful requirements assistant should expose assumptions rather than silently resolving every ambiguity. Compare models on what they clarify, omit and invent, not on polished formatting.

Read the protocol↗
Research blueprint

Claude Versus GPT for Linux Troubleshooting

A plausible troubleshooting command is not a verified diagnosis. Separate evidence gathering, causal explanation and proposed remediation in the evaluation.

Read the protocol↗
Research blueprint

Context Engineering Versus Prompt Rewriting

An improved prompt cannot supply evidence that the system never receives. Compare changes to instruction wording with changes to document selection and tool context.

Read the protocol↗
Research blueprint

Can Claude and GPT Detect Unsafe Deployment Plans?

Deployment review requires noticing specific assumptions about data, permissions and recovery. A generic warning list is less useful than identifying the exact unsafe step.

Read the protocol↗
Research blueprint

When Coding Agents Pass Tests but Miss Requirements

Tests can encode the wrong acceptance target or omit important behaviour. Evaluate agent-written code against independently defined requirements rather than its own test suite alone.

Read the protocol↗
Research blueprint

Claude Versus GPT for Research Source Fidelity

A research answer must preserve what a source actually establishes. Compare evidence fidelity separately from breadth, fluency and apparent confidence.

Read the protocol↗
Research blueprint

Reasoning Budget and Cost-Adjusted Task Success

Additional reasoning effort may help some tasks and add cost without benefit on others. The result should be evaluated per task class, not as a universal setting.

Read the protocol↗
Research blueprint

Prompt Caching Under Changing Context

Caching benefits depend on repeated eligible input, not simply on repeating a user's question. Measure workload patterns and cache behaviour rather than assuming the advertised mechanism matches every workflow.

Read the protocol↗
Research blueprint

Single-Agent Versus Multi-Agent Workflows

Additional agents create coordination work as well as parallel capacity. Compare final evidence quality and failure recovery alongside completion speed.

Read the protocol↗
Research blueprint

Tool Descriptions and Agent Failure Rates

Tool descriptions influence which operation an agent selects and what parameters it supplies. Descriptions should explain preconditions and consequences, not just the operation name.

Read the protocol↗